In Home Depot Inc. v. Steadfast Insurance Co., Home Depot learned the hard way a rule every DIY enthusiast knows: measure twice, cut once. It appears Home Depot’s measurements were off when it sized up its insurance needs, and when its cyber coverage didn’t measure up to the costs of a data breach, the company tried to fit those cyber claims into its commercial general liability (CGL) policies. However, the Sixth Circuit ruled that those claims do not fit within the ... Keep Reading »
Exclusions/Exceptions
Texas Supreme Court Holds $220M Settlement Agreement Is Not Binding on Insurers Without Insurer’s Consent Where Insured Faced No Liability Beyond Non-Insurance Assets
In In re Illinois National Insurance Co., the Texas Supreme Court held that disclaiming insurers were not bound by any underlying settlement agreement, entered into without the insurers’ consent, where the claimants promised not to pursue the insured’s non-insurance assets. The underlying claimants were investment funds that filed suit in 2014 against Cobalt International Energy and its officers and directors. The claimants asserted securities fraud in connection with ... Keep Reading »
Divided Ninth Circuit Finds Toxic Dust From Wildfire Is Not “Pollutant” Under Policy’s Pollution Exclusion
In Wesco Insurance Co. v. Brad Ingram Construction, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a summary judgment ruling in favor of Wesco Insurance Co. after a split panel concluded that toxic dust and debris from a wildfire did not fall under the policy’s definition of “pollutant.” Background and Underlying Action The plaintiff in the underlying lawsuit, Richard Vargas, was allegedly exposed to toxic dust while loading and unloading his work truck during the ... Keep Reading »
Tenth Circuit Upholds Clear and Unambiguous ATV Exclusion in Homeowners Policy
The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals declared that an insurer’s homeowners policy all-terrain vehicle exclusion barred coverage for a Utah insured’s injuries that did not occur at the “insured location.” The case, Farm Bureau Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Cleaver, involved a claim arising out of injuries sustained by minor E.C. while riding an ATV on an unpaved, county-owned public road from a nearby gravel pit back to the insured’s home, which was insured by ... Keep Reading »
California Court Holds Intentional Acts Exclusion Bars Coverage for Shooting Claim Even Though Shooter Believed Gun Unloaded
In Helguera v. Mid-Century Insurance Co., California’s Fourth District Court of Appeal held that an intentional acts exclusion in the liability coverage part of a homeowners insurance policy issued by Mid-Century Insurance Co. barred coverage for an underlying wrongful death lawsuit. The court rejected the insured’s argument that the exclusion rendered coverage illusory. The underlying wrongful death lawsuit involved a shooting at a party at the insured’s house. ... Keep Reading »
Explosives Manufacturer’s Pollution-Related Claim Blown Up by State-Specific Endorsement
In Dyno Nobel v. Steadfast Insurance Co., the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that, under Utah law, where a specific state is listed in an endorsement heading, coverage under the endorsement is limited to claims that have a nexus with that state, so long as such a reading is consistent with the body of the endorsement and policy text. Dyno Nobel is an explosives manufacturer with its principal place of business in Utah. It purchased a commercial general ... Keep Reading »
Washington Appellate Court Finds Insureds’ Failure to Provide Statutory Notice of Intent to Sue Did Not Void Default Judgments Against Insurer
In Gates v. Homesite Insurance Co., the Washington Court of Appeals held that the plaintiff-insureds’ failure to provide 20 days’ notice of intent to sue its insurer, though required by statute, was a mere “procedural irregularity” insufficient to void the default judgments entered against the insurer. The court also noted that the insurer’s failure to timely respond to the lawsuit was the result of an “internal communication issue” and not an extraordinary circumstance ... Keep Reading »
New York Federal Court Enforces “Third Party or Contracted Security” Exclusion to Abrogate Duty to Defend for All Defendants in Assault Suit
In Clear Blue Specialty Insurance Co. v. TFS NY Inc., the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, interpreting the plain and unambiguous terms of a commercial general liability policy issued by Clear Blue Specialty Insurance Co. to TFS NY Inc., ruled Clear Blue did not have a duty to defend TFS against a suit arising from an alleged assault. TFS does business as Sugardaddy’s and owns and operates a nightclub. The underlying dispute stemmed from a ... Keep Reading »
No Paying Over Slow Milk? Wisconsin Appellate Court Finds Intentional Act by Cattle Feed Supplier May Be “Occurrence” Under CGL Policy
In Riverback Farms LLC v. Saukville Feed Supplies Inc., a panel of the Wisconsin Court of Appeals found that an intentional act may still constitute an “occurrence” under a commercial general liability policy, reversed the circuit court’s summary judgment finding of no coverage in favor of the insurer, and remanded for further proceedings. The underlying claim arose when a cattle feed supplier substituted an ingredient in its feed that ultimately led to a magnesium ... Keep Reading »
Eighth Circuit Finds Assault & Battery Exclusion Bars CGL Coverage for Bar Patron’s Gunshot Injury
In Scaglione v. Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Co., the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court order holding that an assault and battery exclusion in a commercial general liability policy barred coverage for the insured bar owner with respect to an equitable garnishment action brought by a bar patron who was hit by a stray bullet during a dispute between two other patrons. In the underlying action, Sominkcole Conner, the victim of a shooting at Voce ... Keep Reading »
- « Previous Page
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- …
- 15
- Next Page »