In Pierce v. Banks, the Georgia Court of Appeals reversed a trial court order denying plaintiff Aaron Pierce’s partial motion for summary judgment and granting a cross-motion to enforce a settlement in favor of defendant Kyndyl Banks. The central question for both motions was whether a binding presuit settlement agreement existed between the parties under Georgia’s 2021 presuit demand statute (O.C.G.A. § 9-11-67.1). In February 2021, Pierce was involved in a motor ... Keep Reading »