In Berardi v. FMI Insurance Co., a panel of New Jersey’s Superior Court, Appellate Decision, affirmed a lower court’s ruling, which ordered a primary home insurer to defend its insured in a dog bite lawsuit, stemming from alleged injuries sustained by a house cleaner at the insured’s secondary home. Background and Underlying Action The plaintiffs, Anthony and Janet Berardi, own a primary residence in Sparta, New York, along with a second home in Montauk, New York. ... Keep Reading »
Tenth Circuit Upholds Clear and Unambiguous ATV Exclusion in Homeowners Policy
The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals declared that an insurer’s homeowners policy all-terrain vehicle exclusion barred coverage for a Utah insured’s injuries that did not occur at the “insured location.” The case, Farm Bureau Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Cleaver, involved a claim arising out of injuries sustained by minor E.C. while riding an ATV on an unpaved, county-owned public road from a nearby gravel pit back to the insured’s home, which was insured by ... Keep Reading »
Second Circuit Warns Insurers of Risks of Forgoing Discovery
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals recently found an insurer’s decision to waive discovery foreclosed its ability to provide extrinsic evidence to resolve an ambiguous insurance policy. In Ezrasons Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co., the insurer, Travelers Property Casualty Co., had refused to indemnify its insured, Ezrasons Inc., for the full policy limit because it contended the loss did not occur at an “approved location” under the policy. The Second Circuit ultimately ... Keep Reading »
Second Circuit Weighs in on Scope of Business Enterprise Exclusion, Finds It Bars Coverage for Legal Malpractice Suit
Directors and officers (D&O) and errors and omissions (E&O) policies often contain “capacity” limitations, which restrict coverage to claims against the insured alleging acts undertaken by the insured in his or her insured capacity. These insured capacity limitations can take on different forms. For example, the policy may limit the definition of an “insured person” to someone acting in his or her capacity as an officer or director of the insured company. Or the ... Keep Reading »
New Jersey Appellate Court Clarifies Meaning of “Wrongful Eviction” in Personal and Advertising Injury Coverage Section of Standard CGL Policy
In Watford Specialty Insurance Co. v. MDF 92 River Street LLC, the New Jersey Appellate Division clarified that the term “wrongful eviction” in the insuring agreement of a commercial general liability policy’s “personal and advertising injury” coverage section contemplates eviction from a place where the individual has a possessory interest or right of private occupancy. In that case, insurer Watford Specialty Insurance Co. issued a commercial general liability policy ... Keep Reading »
California Court Holds Intentional Acts Exclusion Bars Coverage for Shooting Claim Even Though Shooter Believed Gun Unloaded
In Helguera v. Mid-Century Insurance Co., California’s Fourth District Court of Appeal held that an intentional acts exclusion in the liability coverage part of a homeowners insurance policy issued by Mid-Century Insurance Co. barred coverage for an underlying wrongful death lawsuit. The court rejected the insured’s argument that the exclusion rendered coverage illusory. The underlying wrongful death lawsuit involved a shooting at a party at the insured’s house. ... Keep Reading »
Kentucky Holds No Coverage for Malicious Prosecution Claim Under Policy Issued After Claimant’s Wrongful Arrest
In City of Newport v. Westport Insurance Co., the Kentucky Court of Appeals addressed whether coverage existed for a malicious prosecution claim in a law enforcement liability policy that covered only periods of time during the claimant’s incarceration, but not when the claimant was originally arrested and wrongfully convicted of the crimes. In the late 1980s, William Virgil was convicted of crimes he did not commit and spent 28 years in prison before DNA testing ... Keep Reading »
Federal Court Finds No Coverage for Mouthwash Tainted From Auto Cleanser Equipment
Applying well-settled Wisconsin law, a federal district court found that an insurer had no duty to indemnify an oral hygiene product manufacturer for tainted products after determining that the losses did not result from an “occurrence” under an excess liability policy. The case, Sage Products LLC v. Federal Insurance Co., arose from a recall of single-use oral hygiene kits that were provided to hospitals and nursing homes. The supplier of the kits contracted with a ... Keep Reading »
“Common Sense Should Prevail” — Federal Court Recognizes Exception to “Eight-Corners Rule,” Allows Use of Undisputed Extrinsic Evidence to Preclude Duty to Defend
In Southern-Owners Insurance Co. v. Midnight Tires Inc., the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida granted an insurer’s motion for summary judgment after considering extrinsic evidence on the issue of the insurer’s duty to defend in an action seeking a declaration that the insured’s garage general liability policy did not cover claims in an underlying motor vehicle injury lawsuit. In the underlying action, Midnight Tires Inc. was sued in connection ... Keep Reading »
Explosives Manufacturer’s Pollution-Related Claim Blown Up by State-Specific Endorsement
In Dyno Nobel v. Steadfast Insurance Co., the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that, under Utah law, where a specific state is listed in an endorsement heading, coverage under the endorsement is limited to claims that have a nexus with that state, so long as such a reading is consistent with the body of the endorsement and policy text. Dyno Nobel is an explosives manufacturer with its principal place of business in Utah. It purchased a commercial general ... Keep Reading »
- « Previous Page
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- …
- 48
- Next Page »