PropertyCasualtyFocus

  • All Topics
  • Contributors
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Bad Timing Dooms Bad Faith Claim

January 31, 2013 by John W. Herrington

A recent decision by a New Jersey Appellate Court clarifies both the scope of a New Jersey insurer’s duty of good faith in resolving a first-party uninsured motorist claim and the way in which claims for breach of that duty must be raised. The plaintiff in Wadeer v. New Jersey Manufacturers Ins. Co., A-3206-10T4 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div., Dec. 13, 2012), was severely injured when a “phantom vehicle” swerved into his lane and made him lose control of his car.  He was ... Keep Reading »

To Boldly Go Where No Insurance Has Gone Before: New Mexico Redefines Portable Coverage

January 28, 2013 by John C. Pitblado

You might have missed the arrival of the future, but Wikipedia now reports matter-of-factly that Spaceport America “is a spaceport located in” a desert basin in New Mexico.  (The only surprising fact is that the nearest town is called “Truth or Consequences.”)  This month, a company called “Virgin Galactic,” a member of the Virgin Group that plans to provide sub-orbital spaceflights to “space tourists,” is scheduled to make its first monthly rent payment on the $209 ... Keep Reading »

Casting a Wide Net: Challenges to Lender-Placed Flood Insurance Erode Distinctions Between Banks and Insurers

January 25, 2013 by John W. Herrington and Robert D. Helfand

As banks play an increasing role in the marketing and sale of property-casualty insurance products, the businesses of banking and insurance are becoming entangled.  One place where they intersect is the purchase of lender-placed insurance protecting against floods and other hazards.  Uniform mortgage agreements typically give banks a right to “require” their borrowers to maintain certain types of insurance on mortgaged property, and to separately purchase that insurance ... Keep Reading »

What’s in a Proper Name? Coverage Opinions Take Different Approaches

January 24, 2013 by John C. Pitblado

In his 1892 paper, “On Sense and Reference,” Gottlob Frege, the German philosopher who inspired the work of Bertrand Russell, explained that the definition of a word or name can have two components.  One, “reference” (or “referent”), is simply the person or object to which the word refers.  The “reference” of “Napoleon Bonaparte” is the French emperor who bore that name.  The second element, “sense,” is the name’s “mode of presentation,” which reflects the manner in ... Keep Reading »

NAIC Hears Renewed Calls for Regulation of Automated Claims Tools

January 23, 2013 by Kristin Ann Shepard

On December 1, 2012, for the second time this year, the Market Regulation and Consumer Affairs (D) Committee of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners heard presentations about insurers’ use of computerized systems to assist in the adjustment of bodily injury and property claims.  The hearing concentrated on three products:  Computer Science Corporation’s “Colossus,” ISO’s “Claims Outcome Advisor” and Xactware Solutions, Inc.’s “Xactimate.” The ... Keep Reading »

No, SIR: The Self-Insured Retains a Duty of Self-Defense

January 18, 2013 by John R. Hart

In the realm of liability insurance, the terms “deductible” and “self-insured retention” are often used interchangeably, but the two provisions have important differences.  Among other things, “policies which are subject to self-insured retentions are ‘excess policies' which have no duty to indemnify until the self-insured retention is exhausted.”  Century Indemnity Co. v. The Marine Group, No. 3:08-CV-01375-AC (D. Ore. Dec. 3, 2012), quoting Pacific Employers Ins. Co. ... Keep Reading »

Live Free of Actual Knowledge or Coverage Will Die

January 17, 2013 by John C. Pitblado

In September 2012, the highest court of the Granite State reversed a decision that rescinded an insurance contract on the basis of a material false statement in the application.  The Supreme Court held that rescission was unavailable, because the policy was ambiguous.  The court suggested, in other words, that an insurance policy must clearly express the insurer’s intention not to be forced to provide coverage on the basis of misrepresentations.  Parties to other types ... Keep Reading »

Excess is Enough: Courts Decline to Expand Liability of Excess Insurers

January 15, 2013 by John R. Hart

Judicial opinions that purport to construe “the policy as a whole” are often bad news for insurers, but two recent decisions used that analysis to defeat plaintiffs with novel arguments for making their excess insurers liable for losses within the primary layer. Intel Corp. v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co., No. 692, 2011 (Del. Sept. 7, 2012), arose out of antitrust litigation against the chip manufacturer, in which Intel paid more than $50 million ... Keep Reading »

Be Careful what you Incorporate: Insurer Bound by Insured’s Arbitration Agreement

January 14, 2013 by Scott C. Shine

When an insurance policy relates to particular contractual obligations of an insured, having the policy specifically identify the underlying contract can help define the insurer’s obligations with precision.  But the reference needs to be precise, too.  In a recent Fourth Circuit case, an insurer’s performance bond recited the fact that the principal had entered into a construction subcontract, and it stated that the “subcontract is by reference made a part hereof.”  ... Keep Reading »

Excess Policy Covers Liability for Occurrence Continuing After the Policy Period Ends

January 11, 2013 by Scott C. Shine

The Second Circuit has held that property damage occurring after the term of an excess liability policy may be included in the calculation of whether damages from a single occurrence reach the policy’s attachment point. In Olin Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co., 11-4055-cv (2d Cir. Dec. 19, 2012), an insured manufacturer of industrial chemicals filed suit against its excess liability insurers, claiming they owed a duty to indemnify it for its costs of remediating ... Keep Reading »

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • Next Page »
Carlton Fields Logo
A blog focused on legal developments in the property-casualty industry by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Get Weekly Updates!

Send Me Updates!

Focused Topics

  • Additional Insured
  • Bad Faith
  • Business Interruption
  • Class Action
  • Construction/Builder’s Risk
  • Coronavirus / COVID-19
  • Cybersecurity
  • Declaratory Judgment
  • Duty to Defend
  • Environmental
  • Flood
  • Homeowners
  • Occurrence
  • Pollution/Pollutant
  • Property
  • Regulatory
  • VIEW ALL TOPICS »

Recent Articles

  • Seventh Circuit Affirms Broad Reading of CGL Policy’s “Radioactive Matter Exclusion” to Include EMF Radiation
  • Iowa Supreme Court Reaffirms Rule That Faulty Workmanship Is Not an Occurrence, Leaving Question of Statutory Fraud for Another Day
  • Florida District Court Orders New Trial After Jury Allowed to Hear Evidence on Claim Handling in Insurance Breach of Contract Claim

Carlton Fields

  • carltonfields.com
  • Practices
  • Industries
  • ExpectFocus Magazine

Related Industries/Practices

  • Insurance
  • Financial Lines Insurance
  • Property & Casualty Insurance
  • Financial Services & Insurance Litigation

About PropertyCasualtyFocus

  • All Topics
  • Contributors
  • About
  • Contact
© 2014–2025 Carlton Fields, P.A. · Carlton Fields practices law in California as Carlton Fields, LLP · All Rights Reserved · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer

Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please contact us. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites. This site may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Web Design by Espo Digital Marketing