PropertyCasualtyFocus

  • All Topics
  • Contributors
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Discovery Issues / Claim Managers Take Note: New York’s Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act Places New, Immediate, and Retroactive Disclosure Obligations Under CPLR 3101(f) on Defendants and Defense Counsel

Claim Managers Take Note: New York’s Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act Places New, Immediate, and Retroactive Disclosure Obligations Under CPLR 3101(f) on Defendants and Defense Counsel

January 13, 2022 by Chael Clark

On December 31, 2021, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul signed into law the Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act, significantly increasing the disclosure requirements for defendants litigating in New York state court.

The Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act amends CPLR 3101(f), which previously allowed plaintiffs in litigation to seek disclosure from defendants as to the existence and contents of any insurance agreement that may be used to satisfy a judgment. Under the newly amended CPLR 3101(f), plaintiffs no longer need to request such information — disclosure is automatic and immediate. Within 60 days of answering a complaint, defendants must disclose to plaintiffs a broad array of “documents and information” concerning the existence and contents of any insurance policies that may be used to satisfy a judgment. This obligation includes all primary, excess, and umbrella policies, complete copies of those policies (including, now, applications for insurance), and the contact information for any persons responsible for adjusting the claim. Defendants must also disclose the amounts available under such policies, whether any lawsuits have reduced or eroded, or may reduce or erode, those policy limits, and whether and in what amount those policy limits have been eroded by attorneys’ fees.

Defendants’ burden to provide plaintiffs with this information does not cease after the initial disclosure. The Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act creates an ongoing obligation for defendants to ensure that the information provided remains accurate and complete, and requires defendants to provide updated information to plaintiffs within 30 days of receipt. This ongoing obligation exists during the entire pendency of the litigation and for 60 days after any settlement or final judgment.

Defendants are not the only parties impacted by the Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act, either. The act also creates a newly added section, CPLR 3122-b, which requires that the information provided under the revised CPLR 3101(f) be certified by both defendants and defense counsel. The certifications must be in the form of a sworn affidavit or affirmation, state that the information is accurate and complete, and state that reasonable efforts have been undertaken, and will be undertaken, to ensure that the information remains accurate and complete.

Finally, it should be noted that the Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act took effect immediately and applies retroactively to all pending actions. Defendants currently in litigation who have not previously provided all of the information required by the revised CPLR 3101(f), and the accompanying certifications required by the newly enacted CPLR 3122-b, must do so by March 1, 2022.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

« Previous Article

Sixth Circuit Finds No Coverage for Alleged Losses Related to COVID-19

Next Article »

Ninth Circuit Affirms Coverage Denial Based on Insured’s Unreasonable Expectations

About Chael Clark

Chael J. Clark is an associate at Carlton Fields in New York. Connect with Chael on LinkedIn.

Related Articles

  1. Eleventh Circuit Finds No “Direct Physical Loss” to Dust-Covered Restaurant that Merely Required Cleaning
  2. CFPB Mortgage-Servicing Regulations will Impact Lender-Placed Insurance
  3. When Should an Insurer Deny Coverage? The Second Circuit Provides Guidance on What Constitutes a Reasonable Time by Which to Deny Coverage Under New York Law
Carlton Fields Logo
A blog focused on legal developments in the property-casualty industry by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Get Weekly Updates!

Send Me Updates!

Focused Topics

  • Additional Insured
  • Bad Faith
  • Business Interruption
  • Class Action
  • Construction/Builder’s Risk
  • Coronavirus / COVID-19
  • Cybersecurity
  • Declaratory Judgment
  • Duty to Defend
  • Environmental
  • Flood
  • Homeowners
  • Occurrence
  • Pollution/Pollutant
  • Property
  • Regulatory
  • VIEW ALL TOPICS »

Recent Articles

  • Tenth Circuit Interprets Excess Policy’s Definition of “Medical Incident” as Applying to the Injuries of One Single Person
  • Divided Ninth Circuit Finds Claimant’s Failure to Provide Medical Records Insulates Insurer From Bad Faith Failure to Settle
  • Eighth Circuit Finds No Coverage Under “Ensuing Loss” Provision Under Arkansas Law

Carlton Fields

  • carltonfields.com
  • Practices
  • Industries
  • ExpectFocus Magazine

Related Industries/Practices

  • Insurance
  • Financial Lines Insurance
  • Property & Casualty Insurance
  • Financial Services & Insurance Litigation

About PropertyCasualtyFocus

  • All Topics
  • Contributors
  • About
  • Contact
© 2014–2025 Carlton Fields, P.A. · Carlton Fields practices law in California as Carlton Fields, LLP · All Rights Reserved · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer

Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please contact us. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites. This site may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Web Design by Espo Digital Marketing