PropertyCasualtyFocus

  • All Topics
  • Contributors
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Archives for Class Action

Class Action

Cyber Risk as a Regulatory Issue: Tales of Encryption

February 20, 2015 by John C. Pitblado and Robert B. Shapiro

Picture of Enigma Plugboard

Spurred by the prescient reporting found in this space (and, just maybe, by the Anthem data breach, which occurred a week later), insurance regulators have recently engaged in a flurry of regulatory activity relating to cyber security issues. Very shortly after the Anthem breach was announced, the newly-formed Cybersecurity (EX) Task Force of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) called for a multi-state examination of Anthem's cybersecurity ... Keep Reading »

California Bans Use of Price Optimization

February 19, 2015 by Robert D. Helfand and Jacob R. Hathorn

Pictured of Store Sale Signs

Yesterday California Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones became the latest voice in a growing chorus of state insurance regulators who condemn the use of "Price Optimization" as a mechanism for adjusting property-casualty insurance rates and pricing.  In a Notice delivered to more than 750 P&C insurers, the Commissioner declared that "any use of Price Optimization in the ratemaking/pricing process or in a rating plan is unfairly discriminatory in violation of ... Keep Reading »

Cyber Risk as a Regulatory Issue: A Connecticut Regulator Shares Her Insights

January 28, 2015 by John C. Pitblado and Robert D. Helfand

Picture of Laptop Spying

Even at Sony, cyber security was a hot topic before Kim Jong-un took an interest in Seth Rogen’s oeuvre. In 2011, hackers gained access to the personal and financial information Sony had collected on more than 100 million participants in its on-line gaming networks.  The incident was the subject of more than 60 class actions, for which Sony announced a settlement last summer. Sony’s plight illustrates one facet of the interrelationship between cyber risk and ... Keep Reading »

Apartment Complexity: Appellate Court Sorts Out Multiple Coverage Claims for Construction of Uninhabitable Residence

November 25, 2014 by Meredith Whigham Caiafa

Picture of a Haunted House

In QBE Ins. Corp. v. Adjo Contracting Corp. (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dep't Oct. 29, 2014), an intermediate appellate court in New York confronted cross-appeals involving 15 different insurers embroiled in multiple lawsuits, including consolidated class actions.  The core issue of the case was whether the insurers for a variety of subcontractors were obligated to provide a defense to tenants' lawsuits against the developer and general contractor of a doomed residential ... Keep Reading »

With Sewers Backing Up, Messy Damage Claims are On the Rise

September 25, 2014 by John C. Pitblado

Picture of Men Working in a Sewer

Andy crawled to freedom through five hundred yards of - - - smelling foulness I can't even imagine. Or maybe I just don't want to. Five hundred yards. The length of five football fields. Just shy of half a mile. –The Shawshank Redemption (1994) Many homeowners and other property insurance policies contain an exclusion to address one of the by-products of the increased frequency of severe weather: it bars coverage for property damage caused by "water which backs up ... Keep Reading »

Claims Handlers: It’s Time to Adjust Our Claims!

September 22, 2014 by Jonathan Sterling

Picture of Children Picketing

Many insurers have a longstanding practice of paying claims adjusters a set weekly salary, regardless of the number of hours they actually work.  The practice has support in federal labor regulations; the regulations expressly exempt claims adjusters from the overtime requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), if their duties include discretionary and administrative activities such as interviewing witnesses, inspecting property damage, reviewing information for ... Keep Reading »

If a Tree Falls on the Internet … An Insurer Has a Duty to Defend

September 5, 2014 by Christopher B. Freeman

Picture of a Fallen Tree

Legal bloggers sometimes ask themselves:  If my post appears on the Internet, but there’s no evidence anyone has read it, have I been published?  The question has not yet been finally resolved among law firm compensation committees, but, in the data privacy context, a federal court in Virginia recently offered an emphatic "yes."  In Travelers Indemnity Company of America v. Portal Healthcare Solutions, LLC, No. 1:13-cv-917(GBL) (E.D. Va. Aug. 7, 2014), the court found ... Keep Reading »

All in Good Time: Another Court Refuses to Allow Plaintiff to Force an Early Resolution of Insurer’s Rights Under a Liability Policy

April 4, 2013 by John R. Hart

Like insurance companies, plaintiffs’ class action attorneys do better when they know how to manage risk.  Bringing a case to trial can involve an enormous investment of time and resources, and most firms can’t afford to do it if there’s a significant chance the defendant will not be entitled to liability coverage at the end of the day.  For that reason, avoiding an early resolution of coverage issues can sometimes help an insurer negotiate a more favorable settlement.  ... Keep Reading »

SCOTUS: Would-Be Class Representative Cannot Avoid CAFA Jurisdiction by Stipulating to Limit Damages

March 19, 2013 by John C. Pitblado

Some class action plaintiffs who want to keep their cases in state court execute “stipulations” not to seek more than $5 million in aggregated damages on behalf of the class.  When the case is removed, they argue that the defendant cannot establish that “the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $5,000,000”—the threshold for federal jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act.  In a curt, unanimous opinion authored by Justice Breyer, the Supreme Court of ... Keep Reading »

Oregon Supreme Court Addresses Attorneys’ Fees for Appellate Proceedings in Class Action Over Automated Review of Medical Bills

March 12, 2013 by John C. Pitblado

Strawn v. Farmers Insurance Co. of Oregon is a class action that challenged the insurer’s use of automated bill review systems to determine the reasonableness of medical claims submitted under the Personal Injury Protection (PIP) coverage of automobile policies.  The plaintiff alleged that Farmers had promised to pay the “reasonable” cost of covered medical services, but had failed to do so.  In May 2011, the Supreme Court of the State of Oregon ruled that a class could ... Keep Reading »

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next Page »
Carlton Fields Logo
A blog focused on legal developments in the property-casualty industry by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Get Weekly Updates!

Send Me Updates!

Focused Topics

  • Additional Insured
  • Bad Faith
  • Business Interruption
  • Class Action
  • Construction/Builder’s Risk
  • Coronavirus / COVID-19
  • Cybersecurity
  • Declaratory Judgment
  • Duty to Defend
  • Environmental
  • Flood
  • Homeowners
  • Occurrence
  • Pollution/Pollutant
  • Property
  • Regulatory
  • VIEW ALL TOPICS »

Recent Articles

  • Divided Ninth Circuit Finds Claimant’s Failure to Provide Medical Records Insulates Insurer From Bad Faith Failure to Settle
  • Eighth Circuit Finds No Coverage Under “Ensuing Loss” Provision Under Arkansas Law
  • Texas Appeals Court Finds Project Owner Excluded From Coverage as Claimants’ Statutory Employer

Carlton Fields

  • carltonfields.com
  • Practices
  • Industries
  • ExpectFocus Magazine

Related Industries/Practices

  • Insurance
  • Financial Lines Insurance
  • Property & Casualty Insurance
  • Financial Services & Insurance Litigation

About PropertyCasualtyFocus

  • All Topics
  • Contributors
  • About
  • Contact
© 2014–2025 Carlton Fields, P.A. · Carlton Fields practices law in California as Carlton Fields, LLP · All Rights Reserved · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer

Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please contact us. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites. This site may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Web Design by Espo Digital Marketing