PropertyCasualtyFocus

  • All Topics
  • Contributors
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
You are here: Home / Regulatory / New York Statute Aims to Curb Abuse of Certificates of Insurance

New York Statute Aims to Curb Abuse of Certificates of Insurance

February 10, 2015 by Robert Schmidlin

Illustration of Honoré de Balzac's The Marriage ContractA certificate of insurance (“COI”) is a document issued by an insurer or broker that evidences the existence of insurance coverage under specific circumstances.  On January 28, 2015, New York’s Governor Andrew Cuomo signed into law a bill (S.6545-A/A.9590-A) that establishes standards for the issuance of COIs by insurers and insurance producers.  The new law also authorizes the state’s Department of Financial Services (“DFS”) to impose penalties for violations.

The COI Problem

Certificates of insurance are essential elements of many different types of business transactions, especially those involving construction.  They are also a perennial subject of coverage litigation.  General contractors who require their subs to maintain certain types of coverage receive doctored COIs from over-eager applicants.  Landlords who want to be named as additional insureds on their tenants’ policies rely on a COI, even after the underlying policy has lapsed.  Agents sometimes issue bogus COIs to cover their own errors, putting the insurers they represent on the hook.  As one court recently noted,

A standard certificate of insurance is not an insurance policy.  Rather, [it] … could be considered a worthless document which does no more than certify that insurance existed on the day the certificate was issued.

Newport Assocs. Phase I Developers v. Travelers Cas. & Surety Co., 2013 WL 10090299 (N.J.Super.A.D. Jan. 16, 2015).

According to the legislative sponsor’s memorandum, the New York bill was drafted to address problems with vendors that do business with state agencies.  Several branches of New York’s government have a longstanding practice of requiring evidence of insurance as a condition of doing business.  Those agencies have typically required prospective vendors to provide the evidence on a pre-printed form supplied by the agency itself.  In many cases, the language on the form varied from the terms of the actual insurance policy.

The sponsor’s memorandum also recognized that private contractors also make demands for terms that end up being added to standard COI forms, even when they do not appear in the underlying policy.  These practices have been especially prevalent in construction projects.

These practices were not usually dishonest; in many cases, they were accompanied by “hold harmless” agreements or other terms that would make the language of the COI control in the event of a conflict with the insurance policy.  But they were still problematic, since they purported to provide coverage through forms that had not been approved by the state’s insurance department.

New York Took Notice

The New York Insurance Department (now the DFS) recognized this problem and issued both opinion letters and Circular Letters (e.g., Circular Letter No. 8 (1995) and Circular Letter No. 15 (1997)) declaring that requests to modify COIs were improper and advising insurance producers against the practice.  Circular Letter No. 15 stated:

Licensed producers are advised that they may not add terms or clauses to a certificate of insurance which alter, expand or otherwise modify the terms of the actual policy unless authorized by the insurer which has filed an appropriate endorsement with the Superintendent of Insurance and obtained prior approval, if required. The Department may seek disciplinary measures against producers who continue this practice without authorization from the insurer.

However, despite the Department’s admonishments, the practice persisted.

The New Law

Chapter 552 adds a new Article 5 to the Insurance Law.  At the core of the statute is the definition of COI under new Insurance Law Section 501.  A COI is defined as:

[A]ny document or instrument, no matter how titled or described, which is prepared or issued by an insurer or insurance producer as evidence of property or casualty insurance coverage. [COI] shall not include a policy or insurance or insurance binder, and does not amend, extend or alter the coverage provided by the policy of insurance to which the [COI] makes reference, and is subject to all the terms, exclusions and conditions of such policy.  A [COI] shall not confer to any person new or additional rights beyond what the referenced policy of insurance expressly provides.

New Insurance Law Section 502 sets forth prohibited COI practices, including, among others:

  • altering or modifying a COI form;
  • requiring or requesting that a COI contain additional terms conditions or language of any kind that is not found in the insurance policy; and
  • issuing an opinion letter, warranty or similar document that is inconsistent with the statute’s prohibitions.

However, an insurer (or an insurance producer authorized by the insurer) may issue an addendum to a COI that clarifies and explains the coverage provided by an insurance policy.

New Insurance Law Section 504 grants the Superintendent of DFS authority to examine and investigate the activities of any person whom the Superintendent reasonably believes has been or is engaged in acts or practices prohibited under the law. Violations of the statute are civil penalties under Section 408 of the Financial Services Law, which establishes a $5,000 penalty per offense, in addition to other civil or criminal penalties.  The Superintendent is authorized to issue regulations to carry out the requirements of the law.

New York’s Office of State Inspector General is also granted investigative powers with respect to state governmental entities engaged in practices prohibited by the statute.

Get Ready

The bill will become effective 90 days after it becomes a law, which would be on or about April 28, 2015.  However,  the Professional Insurance Agents Association of New York expects the law to become effective in February, after the Legislature passes a technical amendment to the statute removing a specific reference to the standardizing body that issues COI forms.

Image source: E. Toudouze (Wikimedia)

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

« Previous Article

No Manifestation Destiny: The Seventh Circuit Declines to Set a Standard Trigger Rule for First-Party Property Policies

Next Article »

California Bans Use of Price Optimization

About Robert Schmidlin

Related Articles

  1. What You Must Know about New York’s Proposed Cybersecurity Regulation for the Banking, Insurance, and Financial Services Sectors
  2. Florida Appellate Court Rejects Bid to Curb Insureds’ Assignments to Contractors
  3. Accrual to be Kind: Pennsylvania Appellate Court Addresses Statute of Limitations for Declaratory Claim
Carlton Fields Logo
A blog focused on legal developments in the property-casualty industry by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Get Weekly Updates!

Send Me Updates!

Focused Topics

  • Additional Insured
  • Bad Faith
  • Business Interruption
  • Class Action
  • Construction/Builder’s Risk
  • Coronavirus / COVID-19
  • Cybersecurity
  • Declaratory Judgment
  • Duty to Defend
  • Environmental
  • Flood
  • Homeowners
  • Occurrence
  • Pollution/Pollutant
  • Property
  • Regulatory
  • VIEW ALL TOPICS »

Recent Articles

  • Tenth Circuit Interprets Excess Policy’s Definition of “Medical Incident” as Applying to the Injuries of One Single Person
  • Divided Ninth Circuit Finds Claimant’s Failure to Provide Medical Records Insulates Insurer From Bad Faith Failure to Settle
  • Eighth Circuit Finds No Coverage Under “Ensuing Loss” Provision Under Arkansas Law

Carlton Fields

  • carltonfields.com
  • Practices
  • Industries
  • ExpectFocus Magazine

Related Industries/Practices

  • Insurance
  • Financial Lines Insurance
  • Property & Casualty Insurance
  • Financial Services & Insurance Litigation

About PropertyCasualtyFocus

  • All Topics
  • Contributors
  • About
  • Contact
© 2014–2025 Carlton Fields, P.A. · Carlton Fields practices law in California as Carlton Fields, LLP · All Rights Reserved · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer

Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please contact us. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites. This site may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Web Design by Espo Digital Marketing