PropertyCasualtyFocus

  • All Topics
  • Contributors
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Down in the Dumps: Court Refuses to Apply Pollution Exclusion in Landfill Seepage Case

March 25, 2015 by Stephen J. Bagge

Picture of a Landfill

Claims involving potential coverage for pollution liability pose unique challenges for insurers. In many cases, the polluting activity occurred decades ago and over a large span of time, with only a fraction of the activity occurring during the policy period. As a result, an issue in pollution liability cases is whether an insurer is obligated to indemnify an insured for the entire amount of damages resulting from pollution, or whether an insurer's obligation may be ... Keep Reading »

Illinois Supreme Court: Innocent Insured Doctrine? For a Lawyer? (cough)

March 19, 2015 by Peter J. Winders

Illustration by Charles Meer Webb

In Illinois State Bar Assoc. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Law Office Of Tuzzolino and Terpinas, the Illinois Supreme Court held that the "innocent insured" doctrine does not protect an innocent prospective insured, if his law partner makes misrepresentations in the application for insurance that void the policy. The parties to this case were the two partners in a law firm, and a client who sued the firm for malpractice, on the one hand, and the Mutual Insurance Company on the ... Keep Reading »

Change is in the Air: New Jersey Justices Hold Their Noses While Siding with Insurer in UM Disputes

March 10, 2015 by Matthew Burrows

Picture of Exxon Oil Refinery in New Jersey

On February 18, 2015, the Supreme Court of New Jersey issued separate opinions in two first-party, uninsured motorist cases against the same auto insurer.  Plaintiffs in both cases alleged that the insurer had acted in bad faith by forcing the insured to trial after losing an arbitration.  The insurer won both cases, on the ground that its position each time had been "fairly debatable" as a matter of law.  But New Jersey’s high court also suggested, in both cases, that ... Keep Reading »

Insurance is Big in Texas: In Deepwater Horizon Case, Texas Stretches a Policy’s Four Corners to Include Other Contracts

March 4, 2015 by Heidi Hudson Raschke

Picture of Deepwater Horizon, an offshore drilling unit

Last month, in In re Deepwater Horizon, Relator, the Supreme Court of Texas applied a fundamental principle of insurance law to a case with enormous financial implications.  The owner of the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig had made BP an additional insured under its liability policies, but it did so pursuant to a drilling contract in which BP had agreed to be responsible for some of the losses those policies covered.  When BP submitted a claim, therefore, a court had to ... Keep Reading »

Cooperate, Or Else

February 27, 2015 by Whitney Fore

Picture of Boy Covering Ears

Cooperation is key. Or so says the 10th Circuit at least, in addressing an appeal from a district court's dismissal of an insured's action in which he failed to cooperate with his insurer's claim investigation. The 10th Circuit held that the insured, Kelly Bryant ("Bryant"), had not clearly demonstrated that the insurance company, Sagamore Insurance Company ("Sagamore"), breached its contract or otherwise acted unreasonably and in bad faith when it denied Bryant's claim ... Keep Reading »

Cyber Risk as a Regulatory Issue: Tales of Encryption

February 20, 2015 by John C. Pitblado and Robert B. Shapiro

Picture of Enigma Plugboard

Spurred by the prescient reporting found in this space (and, just maybe, by the Anthem data breach, which occurred a week later), insurance regulators have recently engaged in a flurry of regulatory activity relating to cyber security issues. Very shortly after the Anthem breach was announced, the newly-formed Cybersecurity (EX) Task Force of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) called for a multi-state examination of Anthem's cybersecurity ... Keep Reading »

California Bans Use of Price Optimization

February 19, 2015 by Robert D. Helfand and Jacob R. Hathorn

Pictured of Store Sale Signs

Yesterday California Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones became the latest voice in a growing chorus of state insurance regulators who condemn the use of "Price Optimization" as a mechanism for adjusting property-casualty insurance rates and pricing.  In a Notice delivered to more than 750 P&C insurers, the Commissioner declared that "any use of Price Optimization in the ratemaking/pricing process or in a rating plan is unfairly discriminatory in violation of ... Keep Reading »

New York Statute Aims to Curb Abuse of Certificates of Insurance

February 10, 2015 by Robert Schmidlin

Illustration of Honoré de Balzac's The Marriage Contract

A certificate of insurance ("COI") is a document issued by an insurer or broker that evidences the existence of insurance coverage under specific circumstances.  On January 28, 2015, New York’s Governor Andrew Cuomo signed into law a bill (S.6545-A/A.9590-A) that establishes standards for the issuance of COIs by insurers and insurance producers.  The new law also authorizes the state’s Department of Financial Services ("DFS") to impose penalties for violations. The COI ... Keep Reading »

No Manifestation Destiny: The Seventh Circuit Declines to Set a Standard Trigger Rule for First-Party Property Policies

February 6, 2015 by Heidi Hudson Raschke

Picture of Roy Rogers and Trigger

When I ... feel my finger on your trigger, I know no one can do me no harm." - John Lennon Property damage can be sudden and dramatic, but it can also be subtle and insidious, and that can make it hard to identify the moment when properly coverage is implicated.  As a result, courts have recognized several different "triggers," depending on the circumstances of the loss and the type of coverage involved.  In November 2014, in Strauss v. Chubb Indemnity Insurance ... Keep Reading »

Cyber Risk as a Regulatory Issue: A Connecticut Regulator Shares Her Insights

January 28, 2015 by John C. Pitblado and Robert D. Helfand

Picture of Laptop Spying

Even at Sony, cyber security was a hot topic before Kim Jong-un took an interest in Seth Rogen’s oeuvre. In 2011, hackers gained access to the personal and financial information Sony had collected on more than 100 million participants in its on-line gaming networks.  The incident was the subject of more than 60 class actions, for which Sony announced a settlement last summer. Sony’s plight illustrates one facet of the interrelationship between cyber risk and ... Keep Reading »

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • …
  • 48
  • Next Page »
Carlton Fields Logo
A blog focused on legal developments in the property-casualty industry by the attorneys of Carlton Fields.

Get Weekly Updates!

Send Me Updates!

Focused Topics

  • Additional Insured
  • Bad Faith
  • Business Interruption
  • Class Action
  • Construction/Builder’s Risk
  • Coronavirus / COVID-19
  • Cybersecurity
  • Declaratory Judgment
  • Duty to Defend
  • Environmental
  • Flood
  • Homeowners
  • Occurrence
  • Pollution/Pollutant
  • Property
  • Regulatory
  • VIEW ALL TOPICS »

Recent Articles

  • Third Circuit Holds Harassment Exclusion Bars Coverage for Sexual Assault Suit Under Pennsylvania Law
  • Tenth Circuit Interprets Excess Policy’s Definition of “Medical Incident” as Applying to the Injuries of One Single Person
  • Divided Ninth Circuit Finds Claimant’s Failure to Provide Medical Records Insulates Insurer From Bad Faith Failure to Settle

Carlton Fields

  • carltonfields.com
  • Practices
  • Industries
  • ExpectFocus Magazine

Related Industries/Practices

  • Insurance
  • Financial Lines Insurance
  • Property & Casualty Insurance
  • Financial Services & Insurance Litigation

About PropertyCasualtyFocus

  • All Topics
  • Contributors
  • About
  • Contact
© 2014–2025 Carlton Fields, P.A. · Carlton Fields practices law in California as Carlton Fields, LLP · All Rights Reserved · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer

Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please contact us. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites. This site may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions. Web Design by Espo Digital Marketing